Diagnóstico de laboratorio de infecciones periprotésicas

  • Maria Jose Cortes Requena Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)
  • Angel David Garcia Mayorgas Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)
  • Tomas Alcantara Martos Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)
Palabras clave: Infección periprotésica, diagnóstico, biomarcador.

Resumen

La infección periprotésica es una de las peores complicaciones que pueden acontecer tras la implantación de una prótesis y su frecuencia ha aumentado de forma considerable al dispararse el número de prótesis de rodilla y cadera que se implantan anualmente en todo el mundo. A día de hoy no existe ninguna prueba con un 100% de precisión diagnóstica para descartar la infección periprotésica. Es por ello que en los últimos años han proliferado numerosos test diagnósticos. Entre ellos figuran la determinación de la VSG y la PCR, que constituyen una herramienta de evaluación inicial y deben cuantificarse en todos los pacientes con sospecha de infección. Si la sospecha clínica es alta o se obtiene un valor sugestivo de infección, se debe realizar una artrocentesis y proceder al análisis del líquido sinovial. La tinción de Gram no está recomendada de forma rutinaria. El marcador sérico más respaldado por la evidencia actualmente sería la IL-6 con una sensibilidad y especificidad muy altas. Con respecto a los biomarcadores del líquido sinovial, la alfa-defensina y la esterasa leucocitaria son las más ampliamente reconocidas para su uso.ABSTRACTPeriprosthetic Joint Infection is one of the worst complications that can take place after a joint replacement and its frequency has increased with the rising amount of arthroplasties implanted annually around the world. Nowadays, there is no test with 100% diagnostic accuracy for periprosthetic infection; thus, many diagnostic tests have proliferated in recent years. Among them, ESR and CRP determination are an initial assessment tool and should be quantified in every patient with a suspected infection. When a suggestive value of infection was obtained or with a high clinical suspicion, an arthrocentesis should be performed with analysis of the synovial fluid. Gram staining is not routinely recommended. Currently the most validated serum marker is IL 6 with a very high sensitivity and specificity. About synovial biomarkers, alpha defensin and leukocyte esterase are the most widely recognized for their use.

Biografía del autor/a

Maria Jose Cortes Requena, Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)
Angel David Garcia Mayorgas, Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)
Tomas Alcantara Martos, Hospital Universitario San Agustín (Linares, Jaen)

Citas

- Bozic K.J, Kurtz S.M, Lau E, et al. The epidemiology of revision total hip arthroplasty in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Jan; 91(1):128-33. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00155. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19122087

- Parvizi J, Gehrke T; International Consensus Group on Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jul; 29(7):1331. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.009. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24768547

- Balato G, Franceschini V, Ascione T, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid, blood markers, and microbiological testing in chronic knee prosthetic infections. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Nov 4. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2832-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29103074

- Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, et al. Combined measurement of synovial fluid [alpha]-defensin and C-reactive protein levels: highly accurate for diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; Sep 3; 96(17):1439-45. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01316. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187582

- Kapadia BH, Berg RA, Daley JA,et al. Periprosthetic joint infection. Lancet. 2016 Jan 23; 387(10016):386-394. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61798-0. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26135702

- Parvizi J, Della Valle CJ. AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline: diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infections of the hip and knee. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010 Dec; 18(12):771-2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21119143

- Kim SG, Kim JG, Jang KM, et al. Diagnostic Value of Synovial White Blood Cell Count and Serum C-Reactive Protein for Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec; 32(12):3724-3728. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.013. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28800858

- Lenski M, Scherer MA. Synovial IL-6 as inflammatory marker in periprosthetic joint infections. J Arthroplasty. 2014 Jun; 29(6):1105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.014. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24559521

- Patel R, Alijanipour P, Parvizi. J Advancements in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infections after Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Open Orthop J. 2016 Nov 30; 10:654-661. doi: 10.2174/1874325001610010654. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28144375

- Xie K, Qu X, Yan M. Procalcitonin and α-Defensin for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr; 32(4):1387-1394. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.001. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27817992

- Wang C, Wang Q, Li R, et al. Synovial Fluid C-reactive Protein as a Diagnostic Marker for Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chin Med J (Engl). 2016 Aug 20; 129(16):1987-93. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.187857. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27503025

- Shahi A, Kheir MM, Tarabichi M, et al. Serum D-Dimer Test Is Promising for the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection and Timing of Reimplantation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Sep 6; 99(17):1419-1427. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01395. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28872523

- Newman JM, George J, Klika AK et al. The Role of Synovial Cytokines in the Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Current Concepts. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2017 Sep/Oct; 46(5):E308-E313. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29099890

- Balato G, Franceschini V, Ascione T, et al. High performance of α-defensin lateral flow assay (Synovasure) in the diagnosis of chronic knee prosthetic infections. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Oct 7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4745-x. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28988303

- Saleh A, Ramanathan D, Siqueira MBP, et al. The Diagnostic Utility of Synovial Fluid Markers in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2017 Nov; 25(11):763-772. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00548. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29059113

- Wang C, Li R, Wang Q, Wang C. Synovial Fluid Leukocyte Esterase in the Diagnosis of Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017 Nov 3. doi: 10.1089/sur.2017.192. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29099342

- Springer BD. The Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Jun; 30(6):908-11. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.042. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25913561

- Matsen Ko L, Parvizi J. Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Infection: Novel Developments. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan; 47(1):1-9.0 doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.003. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26614915

- Wouthuyzen-Bakker M, Ploegmakers JJW, Kampinga GA, et al. Synovial calprotectin: a potential biomarker to exclude a prosthetic joint infection. Bone Joint J. 2017 May; 99-B(5):660-665. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B5.BJJ-2016-0913.R2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28455476

- Friedrich MJ, Wimmer MD, Schmolders J, et al. RANK-ligand and osteoprotegerin as biomarkers in the differentiation between periprosthetic joint infection and aseptic prosthesis loosening. World J Orthop. 2017 Apr 18; 8(4):342-349. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i4.342. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28473963

- Yee DK, Chiu KY, Yan CH et al. Review article: Joint aspiration for diagnosis of periprosthetic infection. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2013 Aug; 21(2):236-40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24014792

- Zmistowski B, Della Valle C, Bauer TW. et al. Diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. J Orthop Res. 2014 Jan; 32 Suppl 1:S98-107. doi: 10.1002/jor.22553. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2446490

- Oethinger M, Warner DK, Schindler SA, et al. Diagnosing periprosthetic infection: false-positive intraoperative Gram stains. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Apr; 469(4):954-60. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1589-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20882377

- Deirmengian C, Kardos K, Kilmartin P, et al. Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection: has the era of the biomarker arrived? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Nov; 472(11):3254-62. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3543-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24590839

- Cooper HJ, Della Valle CJ. Advances in the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Expert Opin Med Diagn. 2013 May; 7(3):257-63. doi: 10.1517/17530059.2013.783010. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23517618

- Lausmann C, Zahar A, Citak M, et al. Are There Benefits In Early Diagnosis Of Prosthetic Joint Infection With Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction? J Bone Jt Infect. 2017 Sep 28; 2(4):175-183. doi: 10.7150/jbji.22062.

Publicado
2018-07-16
Sección
Artículos de Revisión